tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7971820842270330168.post3123595977807352141..comments2024-01-20T16:28:46.327-08:00Comments on Wordgazer's Words: But Is It Science?Kristenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08252374623355509404noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7971820842270330168.post-63520395920108232302014-10-13T00:01:13.727-07:002014-10-13T00:01:13.727-07:00That Barash guy seems like a Richard Dawkins clone...That Barash guy seems like a Richard Dawkins clone to me. Sad. Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7971820842270330168.post-85859813186613630132014-10-05T18:48:30.856-07:002014-10-05T18:48:30.856-07:00Thanks, sis!
I enjoyed the letters to the editor, ...Thanks, sis!<br />I enjoyed the letters to the editor, but none of them pointed out the power differential. I think it needed to be said-- and read. Oh well.<br />Kristenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08252374623355509404noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7971820842270330168.post-29636118892575211302014-10-05T10:01:19.173-07:002014-10-05T10:01:19.173-07:00An excellent commentary, Kristen. The NYT only sel...An excellent commentary, Kristen. The NYT only selects a handful of letters for publication, and there were some excellent letters of rebuttal, including one from a Rabbi. The letters are worth reading. Here's the link. http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/05/opinion/sunday/science-and-religion.html<br /><br />Your SisAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com