tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7971820842270330168.post1502712155625876097..comments2024-01-20T16:28:46.327-08:00Comments on Wordgazer's Words: Turning the TablesKristenhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/08252374623355509404noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7971820842270330168.post-90148036200812885732012-03-07T14:50:51.431-08:002012-03-07T14:50:51.431-08:00Quite right, Annonymous; it's all part of the ...Quite right, Annonymous; it's all part of the "Great Chain of Being" thinking which Aristotle started and the medieval/Elisabethan church ran with. Thanks so much for commenting, and please keep reading!Kristenhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08252374623355509404noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-7971820842270330168.post-29663077079956759702012-03-06T01:41:09.402-08:002012-03-06T01:41:09.402-08:00Hi, I've never commented on your blog before a...Hi, I've never commented on your blog before although I've read several posts. I've always thought it was ridiculous to argue that 'women have childbirth' while 'men have leadership'. You may as well argue that 'women have superior peripheral vision' - both are physical abilities. The notion that men have leadership and women have childbirth is just a continuation of the classical notion that women are bodily, physical, "lower" beings while men are "higher",more spiritual and logical beings. It's just an ancient sexism re-packaged for Christians.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com